Aug 13 2009

Autism is getting out of hand

It seems not a day passes that you don’t read something about autism.  Data states that one in 100 have some form of autism.  Though I will not deny that autism exists, it seems everyone has some form of it, such that anything and everything can be excused because of it.  It has become a scapegoat for people’s problems.  Minor social dysfunction is attributed to autism. What ever happened to the day when someone can just say they have difficulty with social interaction, rather than be classified as a disorder?  Can’t we leave these diagnoses to the most severe and obvious cases?

There is so much debate about the importance of having a diagnoses.  It is important when there is clear and defined treatment and there are objective data to follow to assess the effectiveness of treatment.  For example, blood pressure can be checked, treated, rechecked.  Similarly, diabetes can be measured and treated.  Less obvious, but still treatable are psychiatric diagnoses such as severe depression.  Milder forms fall into those borderline categories because most normal people will experience highs and lows in their life.

But anxiety and depression are no longer the fad diagnoses.  It’s autism.  I’ll bet everyone who was formerly diagnosed with ADHD, social anxiety disorder, borderline personality disorder, etc., is now being redefined and re-diagnosed as having some form of autism.  Is there really any objective measure – a specific gene defect or some biological marker that can be used to diagnose this?  If not, what will the next fad diagnosis be?

Now, I know that there are no biological markers for such things as severe depression and schizophrenia and such, but anyone who has been around such people can clearly say something was wrong.  Schizophrenics go into phases when they are not normal (of course, many sane people can easily mimic them, but that’s not the point – normal people don’t do it unless they are trying to be manipulative for some reason).  Major depression occurs without an inciting event, such as grief.  These people cannot understand why they are so depressed and are helpless to improve their moods.  Though there are no objective measures, science has been able to identify certain hormones involved in these mood disorders.

But, what about autism?  All we have are a set of behavioural disturbances.  In severe cases, they appear somewhat retarded.  But mild cases where people are high-functioning, how can they really be classified as autistic?  Why isn’t it some form of mild retardation?  Why isn’t it just severe social anxiety?  Why isn’t it just normal but extreme shyness?  And is there really any “treatment” for these cases?  No!  It’s just ridiculous.  I have a big issue with it because if I’m not careful, my children might be considered autistic and I know they are not.  I will go out of my way to point out their lack of social interaction and will not hide behind silly scapegoat diagnoses.


Feb 06 2009

Measles exists, does autism?

Every few years, there appears to be a new and trendy medical diagnosis that everyone must have. One of the recent ones is autism. Any new learning disability becomes labelled as autism. As a result, everyone is out to look for a cause for it. One of these theorists decided to put the blame on the MMR vaccine. (Just like the complaints about developing other neurological conditions after the hepatitis vaccine some years before that.)
As a result, we had parents who either refused to give their children any immunizations or opted for the single vaccines that had to be given over a long period of time. Now, we have a rise in the cases of measles that have broken out across the UK as a direct consequence of those actions. And parents are finally getting the message that the vaccine was found to be safe.

If people could rationally think through all the consequences, and work through the mumbo-jumbo, they might not have panicked. It was not as if the MMR caused death. It was a fear of contracting autism. There was no direct causal link between the MMR and autism. Anecdotes do not prove anything! How can you say that autism did not exist before such-and-such had happened?

What is autism? I wonder if anyone has even come up with a good answer for that. Autism is such a vague term, used to describe practically every learning disability, besides dyslexia. In reality, it is a neuro-developmental disorder, which manifests in many different ways. There seems to be a real autism ‘culture‘ nowadays, so anyone deviating from the exact norm gets classified as autistic.

Unfortunately, the autism society would like to do everything to keep autism in the limelight. They strike fear into every parent’s heart with the idea that certain things will cause autism. (I suppose it is the same kind of reaction people used to have to Down’s Syndrome.) But once people learn to cope with the condition, they will understand that it is not a life-or-death situation. Unfortunately, measles can be a deadly infection.