Death of emergency patient due to paramedic shift end


Unbelievable. Incredible. There are not enough exclamations to describe the kind of reaction an ordinary person would have to the story of a paramedic who put his own needs before that of a critically ill person.

Of course, the decision might not have been his, thus an investigation is pending.  But, regardless of the authority who demanded that the paramedic end his shift, his first moral priority should have been for the welfare of the patient he was carrying.  Though paramedics may not be bound by the Hippocratic oath, they essentially agree to similar codes of ethical conduct.

Imagine a doctor, in the middle of a life-saving code, deciding to go off shift.  That just wouldn’t happen, not unless some extraordinary circumstances where another doctor is available and can take over immediately.  In this case, a paramedic is called to transport a stroke patient to the hospital.  He takes a detour to the ambulance station so that he can go off shift and another driver takes the patient to the hospital, where he ends up dying because he did not receive treatment immediately. 

Now, you might argue that the patient would have died anyway.  But, is that the way we should trivialise someone’s life.  There was a possibility that he could have been saved had intervention taken place in the recommended time frame.  As such, the patient arrived at the hospital outside of the time frame.  (Remember the Natasha Richardson case.)  The driver could have been excused for going off-shift had a driver been available along the way to the hospital, rather than off the route.

So, what was the motive for choosing to go off-shift rather than completing his route then returning to the ambulance station?  Was there a demand for him to turn in?  Or, did he just feel that his duty ended at such and such a time?  Should you be in the emergency health field if you only want to work your shift and forget about it?  What happened to overtime in cases of emergency?  Surely, exceptions to limiting pay exists in such cases.  It costs more in the long-run when you become too tight-fisted to allow for flexibility in shift work hours.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *